Skip to main content

How Google Crawls, Reads, and Indexes a Page with Native Rank’s Optimization Approach

|

Google’s crawling, reading, and indexing process is not just a matter of simple algorithms. It involves complex calculations and prioritization strategies that help the search engine decide the relevance and importance of each webpage. Let’s dive into the math behind Google’s crawling and indexing, and how these computations affect your site’s ranking, while interjecting how Native Rank monitors and optimizes at each stage.

1. Crawling: Calculating Crawl Budget

Googlebot, the web crawler for Google, is tasked with discovering and retrieving the content of web pages. However, every site has a finite crawl budget—the number of pages Googlebot will crawl within a given timeframe.

Crawl Budget Formula:

The crawl budget (CB) is determined by several factors like server resources (SR), page authority (PA), and the site’s freshness (F):

[
CB = left( frac{SR times PA}{1 + F} right) times log(N)
]

Where:

  • ( SR ) = Server resources available to handle Google’s requests.
  • ( PA ) = Page authority, determined by backlinks and the page’s historical performance.
  • ( F ) = Freshness factor, a penalty if the page hasn’t been updated recently.
  • ( N ) = Number of total pages on the website.

Native Rank monitors server response times, ensuring the server resources (SR) are maximized. Additionally, by continuously updating site content and internal linking strategies, they help increase a site’s Page Authority (PA) and reduce the Freshness (F) penalty.

2. Reading: Semantic Understanding and Relevance Score

Once the page is crawled, Google attempts to understand the content using Natural Language Processing (NLP) models, creating a relevance score based on the query. This process involves calculating keyword density, context relevance, and latent semantic indexing (LSI).

Relevance Score Formula:

Relevance (R) is computed as:

[
R = frac{ sum{i=1}^{n} (W{i} cdot S_{i}) + LSI}{ sqrt{(QF cdot W) + C}}
]

Where:

  • ( W_{i} ) = Weight assigned to each keyword ( i ) based on importance in the query.
  • ( S_{i} ) = Semantic similarity score between the keyword and the content of the page.
  • ( LSI ) = Latent Semantic Indexing, which identifies the relationship between terms and concepts.
  • ( QF ) = Query freshness; newer queries receive a boost.
  • ( W ) = Average weight of all keywords across multiple pages.
  • ( C ) = Content quality score.

Native Rank fine-tunes on-page content, optimizing keyword weights (( W{i} )) and ensuring semantic relevance (( S{i} )) through NLP strategies. The use of tools like LSI Graph and Natural Language Processing (NLP) APIs enables Native Rank to create semantically rich content that resonates well with Google’s algorithm.

3. Indexing: Priority and Decision Formula

Once Google calculates relevance, it must decide whether to index the page. Not every page will be indexed, and the decision depends on factors like page authority, relevance, and user engagement metrics (bounce rate, time on page).

Indexing Decision Formula:

Google’s indexation decision can be modeled by the formula:

[
I = frac{PA cdot R cdot UE}{D + F}
]

Where:

  • ( PA ) = Page Authority, determined by backlink profile and historical traffic.
  • ( R ) = Relevance score, from the previous step.
  • ( UE ) = User engagement metrics (average session duration, bounce rate, etc.).
  • ( D ) = Duplicate content penalty, applied if similar content already exists on the web.
  • ( F ) = Freshness of content, encouraging recently updated pages.

Native Rank uses tools like Google Search Console to monitor indexation rates and user engagement. If certain pages are not being indexed, they employ strategies such as content refreshment and internal linking to boost the Page Authority and Freshness.

4. Ranking: Complex Math Behind Page Position

Once indexed, Google needs to rank the page. Ranking involves a more intricate combination of factors like relevance, user satisfaction, link quality, and domain authority.

Ranking Score Formula:

Google’s ranking algorithm can be simplified as:

[
Rk = frac{ sum_{i=1}^{n} (R cdot QL cdot DA cdot UE)}{SP}
]

Where:

  • ( R ) = Relevance score.
  • ( QL ) = Quality of inbound links (weighted by their authority and relevance).
  • ( DA ) = Domain Authority, built over time.
  • ( UE ) = User engagement metrics.
  • ( SP ) = Spam score, which penalizes black-hat SEO tactics.

Native Rank focuses on building Domain Authority (DA) and acquiring Quality Links (QL) from reputable sources, while also enhancing User Engagement (UE) through improved UX/UI design and content strategies. This multi-faceted optimization ensures that the page climbs the rankings over time.

Conclusion: Native Rank’s Approach to Optimization

At each stage—crawling, reading, indexing, and ranking—complex mathematical models are in play to decide how well a page performs in Google Search. Native Rank’s comprehensive SEO strategy is designed to optimize for each of these mathematical components:

  • Maximizing Crawl Budget through server management and content freshness.
  • Optimizing Relevance by improving keyword placement and semantic understanding.
  • Boosting Indexation Likelihood by improving page authority and user engagement.
  • Increasing Ranking Potential through high-quality backlinks and domain authority growth.

By staying on top of these metrics and using both AI-driven insights and manual optimizations, Native Rank ensures clients’ pages are not only indexed but also rank well, driving quality traffic and conversions.


Daniel Dye

Daniel Dye is the President of NativeRank Inc., a premier digital marketing agency that has grown into a powerhouse of innovation under his leadership. With a career spanning decades in the digital marketing industry, Daniel has been instrumental in shaping the success of NativeRank and its impressive lineup of sub-brands, including MarineListings.com, LocalSEO.com, MarineManager.com, PowerSportsManager.com, NikoAI.com, and SearchEngineGuidelines.com. Before becoming President of NativeRank, Daniel served as the Executive Vice President at both NativeRank and LocalSEO for over 12 years. In these roles, he was responsible for maximizing operational performance and achieving the financial goals that set the foundation for the company’s sustained growth. His leadership has been pivotal in establishing NativeRank as a leader in the competitive digital marketing landscape. Daniel’s extensive experience includes his tenure as Vice President at GetAds, LLC, where he led digital marketing initiatives that delivered unprecedented performance. Earlier in his career, he co-founded Media Breakaway, LLC, demonstrating his entrepreneurial spirit and deep understanding of the digital marketing world. In addition to his executive experience, Daniel has a strong technical background. He began his career as a TAC 2 Noc Engineer at Qwest (now CenturyLink) and as a Human Interface Designer at 9MSN, where he honed his skills in user interface design and network operations. Daniel’s educational credentials are equally impressive. He holds an Executive MBA from the Quantic School of Business and Technology and has completed advanced studies in Architecture and Systems Engineering from MIT. His commitment to continuous learning is evident in his numerous certifications in Data Science, Machine Learning, and Digital Marketing from prestigious institutions like Columbia University, edX, and Microsoft. With a blend of executive leadership, technical expertise, and a relentless drive for innovation, Daniel Dye continues to propel NativeRank Inc. and its sub-brands to new heights, making a lasting impact in the digital marketing industry.

More Articles By Daniel Dye

Google’s AI Overviews are changing the SEO landscape. By providing instant answers directly in search results, users no longer need to visit individual websites to find information. While this innovation enhances the user experience, it has caused ripples across industries that rely on organic search traffic. A recent report by NerdWallet highlights how Google AI […]
The political landscape around TikTok is once again uncertain as former President Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House revives conversations about a ban on the app. TikTok, with its 170 million American users, has become a cornerstone of digital advertising and cultural trends. However, a renewed focus on its ties to China could […]
The 2024 election offered significant insights for advertisers, showcasing the importance of strategy, authenticity, and data-driven approaches in connecting with the public. The campaigns of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump highlighted key lessons that can help marketers refine their strategies and drive meaningful results. 1. Strategic Allocation of Budgets Kamala Harris’s campaign spent over $1 […]

Was this helpful?